If not When, then what?
When writing a short description of your novel that provides a “hook” for agents and publishers, it’s often best to start with “When,” according to AgentQuery (via MissSnark):
For example:
The Corrections
When family patriarch, Alfred Lambert, enters his final decline, his wife and three adult children must face the failures, secrets, and long-buried hurts that haunt them as a family if they are to make the corrections that each desperately needs.
And then the site cautions:
As you can see, we’re a fan of the when formula: “When such and such event happens, your main character—a descriptive adjective, age, professional occupation—must confront further conflict and triumph in his or her own special way. Sure, it’s a formula, but it’s a formula that works.
However, be warned…everyone and their grandmother who reads this site will try using our “when” formula, so we recommend simply using it as a starting point.
My question is, are people reaching for the apparently surefire “When” formula in coming up with a snappy description of their novels — or does it also influence how people construct plots? I feel as though I see a lot of novels these days where the protagonist has a nice, stable life — until something happens. He or she has it all, until a parent dies or a hot air balloon drops a ballast bag on his/her head, or he/she inherits a haunted house… whatever. You get the sense that the protagonist would have gone on having a totally boring, satisfactory life for decades and decades, had the “When” thing not happened. I’ve already blogged before about the prevalence of “character forced to confront past” novels, and
especially “city character forced to confront rural past” novels.
My problem: doesn’t this make for somewhat boring protagonists? Stupid, lazy, unmotivated idiots who will just carry on having it all indefinitely unless prodded by outside forces. Maybe I’m especially sensitive to this issue because I started out writing a lot of science fiction stories, and it’s very tempting always to do the Arthur Dent thing, having a totally normal person who gets plunged into a world of strangeness. It’s not so bad when Douglas Adams does it, but it gets a bit dull when the rest of us rely on it too.
Of course, real life has a way of dropping ballast bags on your head, and sometimes you learn more about people by seeing how they respond to unexpected shit. Life has a way of derailing your fondest plans. I guess all I’m saying is, your protagonist should have some plans for life to derail. Why not have your protagonist launch yourstory by making a startling life decision? And then drop the ballast bag on her head.

While South Dakotans debate
Wow. You must read this article from the
Based on watching the first two episodes, it’s going to be hard to like