<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We like the women who tell the pretty stories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://othermag.org/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://othermag.org/blog/?p=192</link>
	<description>pop culture and politics for the new outcasts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:06:22 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DDT-WEBKINZ</title>
		<link>http://othermag.org/blog/?p=192&#038;cpage=1#comment-84829</link>
		<dc:creator>DDT-WEBKINZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 07:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://othermag.org/blog/?p=192#comment-84829</guid>
		<description>Im looking forwards to web2.0 - i read somewhere (ages ago) that wiki&#039;s were the original concept for websites and that the content supposed to be edited online etc?? - lets hope google and MS dont spoil it for everyone...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im looking forwards to web2.0 &#8211; i read somewhere (ages ago) that wiki&#8217;s were the original concept for websites and that the content supposed to be edited online etc?? &#8211; lets hope google and MS dont spoil it for everyone&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;She&#8217;s a smart girl. Just give her some time.&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://othermag.org/blog/?p=192&#038;cpage=1#comment-9901</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;She&#8217;s a smart girl. Just give her some time.&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 19:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://othermag.org/blog/?p=192#comment-9901</guid>
		<description>[...] It just gets back to the idea (courtesy of the New York Times Book Review editor Sam Tanenhaus) that women simply don&#8217;t write about &#8220;hard&#8221; subjects like science and technology, because we&#8217;re just too focused on being cute and writing about daisies. Or something. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It just gets back to the idea (courtesy of the New York Times Book Review editor Sam Tanenhaus) that women simply don&#8217;t write about &#8220;hard&#8221; subjects like science and technology, because we&#8217;re just too focused on being cute and writing about daisies. Or something. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
